Zurück zu den Beiträgen
engineering2 Min. Lesezeit

I never build the whole backend, then the whole frontend. I ship one thin slice that works end to end, then the next.

I ship vertical slices, not layers

Rob Vasquez·

I never build the whole backend, then the whole frontend, then wire them together and pray. I ship one thin slice that works end to end, then the next slice, then the one after that.

It sounds like a small preference. It changes everything about risk.

Build layer by layer and integration becomes a cliff at the end, the moment where all your assumptions meet reality at once, usually the day before the deadline. Build slice by slice and integration happens on day one, on something tiny, where being wrong is cheap. Each slice cuts through schema, API, and UI for one real behavior, and each one demos on its own.

That's why my projects don't have a scary "does it all actually connect" week. It connected in the first slice. Everything after is widening a road that already reaches both sides.

For a team, that means visible progress every few days instead of a long quiet stretch followed by a panic. For me, it means I find the hard problem while it's still small.

This is how I broke down every one of the 20+ apps I've shipped. Want the way I scope a first slice so it's genuinely end-to-end? Ask below.

SoftwareEngineeringAgileDevelopmentFullStackProductEngineering

Brauchst du einen praktischen Weg zu KI-gestützter Auslieferung?

Beginne mit einem KI-Readiness-Audit zum Festpreis und geh mit einer konkreten Roadmap.

KI-Readiness-Audit ansehen